The Flaw of Averages

Author Topic: The Flaw of Averages  (Read 225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ArtofFugue

  • Contributor
  • G501++
  • *****
  • Posts: 6652
  • Karma: +1433/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Hidden
  • PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL PRACTITIONER
    • View Profile
  • The Flaw of Averages
    « on: March 29, 2018, 09:38:45 AM »
    The Flaw of Averages

    by Sam Savage
    A version of this article appeared in the November 2002 issue of Harvard Business Review.




    Consider the case of the statistician who drowns while fording a river that he calculates is, on average, three feet deep. If he were alive to tell the tale, he would expound on the “flaw of averages,” which states, simply, that plans based on assumptions about average conditions usually go wrong. This basic but almost always unseen flaw shows up everywhere in business, distorting accounts, undermining forecasts, and dooming apparently well-considered projects to disappointing results.

    Let’s say that a company I’ll call HealthCeuticals sells a perishable antibiotic. Although demand for the drug varies, for years the average monthly demand has been 5,000 units, so that’s the quantity the company currently stocks. One day, the boss appears. “Give me a forecast of demand for next year,” he says to his product manager. “I need it to estimate inventory cost for the budget.” The product manager responds, “Demand varies from month to month. Here, let me give you a distribution.” But the boss doesn’t want a “distribution.” “Give me a number!” he insists. “Well,” the manager says meekly, “the average demand is 5,000 units a month. So, if you need a single number, go with 5,000.”

    The boss now proceeds to estimate inventory costs, which are calculated as follows: If monthly demand is less than the amount stocked, the firm incurs a spoilage cost of $50 per unsold unit. On the other hand, if the demand is greater than the amount stocked, the firm must air-freight the extra units at an increased cost of $150 each. These are the only two costs that depend on the accuracy of the forecast. The boss has developed a spreadsheet model to calculate the costs associated with any given demand and amount stocked. Since the average demand is 5,000 units, he plugs in 5,000. Since the company always stocks 5,000 units, the spreadsheet dutifully reports that for this average demand, the cost is zero: no spoilage or airfreight costs.

    A bottom line based on average assumptions should be the average bottom line, right? It may miss fluctuations from month to month, but shouldn’t you at least get the correct average cost by plugging in average demand? No. It’s easy to see that the average cost can’t be zero by noting that when demand for HealthCeuticals’ antibiotic deviates either up or down from the average, the company incurs costs.

    Show Me the Number

    Executives’ desire to work with “a number,” to plug in an average figure, is legendary. But whenever an average is used to represent an uncertain quantity, it ends up distorting the results because it ignores the impact of the inevitable variations. Averages routinely gum up accounting, investments, sales, production planning, even weather forecasting. Even the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles sanction the “flaw,” requiring that uncertainties such as bad debt be entered as single numbers. (To its credit, the SEC has proposed new rules that would begin to address this problem.)

    In one celebrated, real-life case, relying on averages forced Orange County, California, into insolvency. In the summer of 1994, interest rates were low and were expected to remain so. Officials painted a rosy picture of the county’s financial portfolio based on this expected future behavior of interest rates. But had they explicitly considered the well-documented range of interest-rate uncertainties, instead of a single, average interest-rate scenario, they would have seen that there was a 5% chance of losing $1 billion or more—which is exactly what happened. The average hid the enormous riskiness of their investments.

    More recently, a failure to appreciate the flaw led to $2 billion in property damage in North Dakota. In 1997, the U.S. Weather Service forecast that North Dakota’s rising Red River would crest at 49 feet. Officials in Grand Forks made flood management plans based on this single figure, which represented an average. In fact, the river crested above 50 feet, breaching the dikes, and unleashing a flood that forced 50,000 people from their homes.

    Fixing the Flaw

    Some executives are already attuned to the importance of acting on a range of relevant numbers—a distribution—rather than single values, and they employ statisticians who estimate the distributions of everything from stock prices to electricity demand. Increasingly, companies are also turning to software-based cures for the flaw. Many programs now simulate uncertainty, generating thousands of possible values for a given scenario—in essence, replacing the low-resolution “snapshot” of a single average number with a detailed “movie.” The movie comprises a whole range of possible values and their likelihood of occurring—the frequency distribution.

    The simplest and most popular tool, called the Monte Carlo simulation, was described by David Hertz in a 1964 HBR article and popularized in financial circles by sophisticated users like Merck CFO and executive vice president Judy Lewent. Today, spreadsheet-based Monte Carlo simulation software is widely available and is being used in fields as diverse as petroleum exploration, financial engineering, defense, banking, and retirement portfolio planning. Wells Fargo Bank, for instance, used a Monte Carlo simulation to predict the cost of offering customers a variable-rate CD, whose return would increase if interest rates rose. A previous estimate based on three years of 1990s interest-rate data had shown that the cost would be about 0.10% for a five-year CD. But the Monte Carlo simulation, which combined interest-rate data going back to 1965 with models of customer behavior, found that the bank’s cost could be eight times that amount. The alarming finding induced the bank to reconfigure its CD product to reduce the chance of unacceptable costs should interest rates rise.

    Had the average-obsessed boss at HealthCeuticals used Monte Carlo simulation, he would have seen not only that the average inventory cost was not zero but that he shouldn’t have been stocking 5,000 units in the first place. For executives like him who are still fond of single values, it’s time for a shift in mind-set. Rather than “Give me a number for my report,” what every executive should be saying is “Give me a distribution for my simulation.”
    By people sharing knowledge/info publicly, the info itself does not devalue to become "common internet data which lacks credibility and needs verifying". If everyone thinks in this way, nobody would want to share anymore in order to protect the value and integrity of their knowledge.

    Offline coco

    • G101-G300
    • **
    • Posts: 297
    • Karma: +9/-0
    • Last Login:April 12, 2018, 03:31:37 PM
    • View Profile
  • Re: The Flaw of Averages
    « Reply #1 on: March 29, 2018, 02:42:23 PM »
    'average' is widely used in math. Drawing lines, points in graph charts. 'average' also in use in banking loans, investments, government aids etc.

    Offline ArtofFugue

    • Contributor
    • G501++
    • *****
    • Posts: 6652
    • Karma: +1433/-0
    • Gender: Male
    • Last Login:Hidden
    • PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL PRACTITIONER
    • View Profile
  • Re: The Flaw of Averages
    « Reply #2 on: July 21, 2018, 01:39:33 PM »
    So? ::)
    By people sharing knowledge/info publicly, the info itself does not devalue to become "common internet data which lacks credibility and needs verifying". If everyone thinks in this way, nobody would want to share anymore in order to protect the value and integrity of their knowledge.

    Online RapaNui

    • Sponsor
    • G101-G300
    • *****
    • Posts: 262
    • Karma: +86/-0
    • Gender: Male
    • Last Login:Today at 02:38:28 AM
      • View Profile
    Re: The Flaw of Averages
    « Reply #3 on: July 21, 2018, 05:29:51 PM »
    Your image of "Averages" is the inversion of Gauss curve. This is STATISTICS !
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function
     8)
    The Flaw of Averages



    RapaNui (Poland)

    Online tyc

    • G501++
    • *****
    • Posts: 550
    • Karma: +60/-0
    • Last Login:Today at 07:44:30 AM
    • View Profile
  • Re: The Flaw of Averages
    « Reply #4 on: July 21, 2018, 10:39:45 PM »
    Just because the picture is inversion, this doesn't mean the picture doesn't exist in real life.  Stats is design to only show "+" result & the most equations reflect some distance away from the mean.  What is mean?  Another term for average.
    If everything in life is measurable, then understanding destiny would be as simple as counting 1, 2, and 3.

    Offline ArtofFugue

    • Contributor
    • G501++
    • *****
    • Posts: 6652
    • Karma: +1433/-0
    • Gender: Male
    • Last Login:Hidden
    • PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL PRACTITIONER
    • View Profile
  • Re: The Flaw of Averages
    « Reply #5 on: July 21, 2018, 11:44:25 PM »

    ...................

    It's not evenly and smooth.....
    By people sharing knowledge/info publicly, the info itself does not devalue to become "common internet data which lacks credibility and needs verifying". If everyone thinks in this way, nobody would want to share anymore in order to protect the value and integrity of their knowledge.

    five arts forum

    Re: The Flaw of Averages
    « Reply #5 on: July 21, 2018, 11:44:25 PM »
    Fortune-telling / birth chart reading / predict your future services by Master Tony (aka aoefengshui). Area of interest:
    Category 1: Relationship/Peach Blossom/Marriage/Spouse/Divorce.
    Category 2: Wealth/Business/Investment/Legal Problem.
    Category 3: Career Plan/Career Move/Job Promotion/Study.
    Category 4: Health/Pregnancy/Children/Accident/Disaster.
    Category 5: The Luck of next 10 years: (Master Tony will work out your luck for next 10 years in general and point out the happening years for the important events).
    Category 6: The Luck of next 12 months: (Master Tony will work out your luck for next 12 months in general and point out the happening months for the important events.)
    Category 7: Your own Category which didn’t mention above.

    Note: Master Tony will provide you the reading report in writing and also one private Q&A session afterwards. Everything to be conducted conveniently and anonymously via this forum online.

    More detail | About Master Tony (aka aoefengshui) | Ask question privately | Post question in Pre-sales forum | Testimonials | View sample Fortune-telling report
    Tired of advertisement on the forum? Remove advertisement on the forum now. For detail, please click here.
    Learn fortune-telling skills from Master Tony (Purple Star Astrology / 紫微斗数 / ZWDS)

    Features: Online private learning | one-on-one teaching | Everything starts from zero | 24/7 access to constantly updated learning materials | Medium of instruction: English

    Tags:
     

    ▲Re: Is it ZWDS Flaw ? (Master Tony or Capriken please help)

    Started by BenjaminBoard Zi Wei Dou Shu (ZWDS) 紫微斗数

    Replies: 2
    Views: 281
    Last post January 12, 2016, 03:18:03 AM
    by Sarah

    Disclaimer:

    Your use of FiveArts.Info is at your sole risk. FiveArts.Info cannot be held responsible for the inaccuracy of the readings and information provided by its members. FiveArts.Info owners, administrators, moderators, masters, members, partners expressly disclaim all warranties of any kind whether express or implied including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.